• About us
  • Advocacy
  • Services
  • News
  • Contact us

兒福聯盟

Donate

兒福聯盟 兒福聯盟

  • About us
  • Advocacy
  • Services
  • News
  • Contact us
Donate
Home  News  News content

Analysis of Policy Proposals on Child Affairs of Six Special Municipalities Mayor Election

2022-11-01
share to

     The mayor election is taking place on November 26th, as youngsters under 18 years old can yet to vote, what is the ideal city environment for children and youngsters these future leaders of the cities planned to build? Five organisations which have been focusing on child and youth welfare including Child Welfare League Foundation (CWLF), Child Health Alliance Taiwan (CHAT), John Tung Foundation, Good Neighbors Taiwan, National Taiwan University Children and Family Research Center (NTUCFRC) Sponsored by CTBC (China Securities and Investment Corporation) Charity Foundation, have conducted an analysis of the child affairs policy proposals of the mayoral candidates of the six special municipalities, and also raised three major urges for future mayors including “plan children-related affairs pragmatically,” “make diverse parenting policies,” and “priority of youngsters participation.”

     Children affairs-related organisations referred to the list of mayoral election candidates from several major polling institutions and selected fifteen major candidates from the six special municipalities. From September 23rd to October 31st, the organisations collected the “Municipalities Mayor Candidates’ Political Proposal Classification Chart” filled by the campaign teams of each candidate, as well as published information from candidates’ official websites, Facebook fan pages, related news reports, etc., to compile, then review the political proposals put out by the candidates. Proposals in this election including “Parenting Financial Support”, “Nursery and Edu-Care Services”, “Parenting-Friendly Workplace”, “Parenting-Friendly Housing”, “Parenting-Friendly Environment”, “Children’s Gaming, Entertainment, and Cultural Recreation”, “Children’s Right to Be Heard and Public Participation”, “Children’s Health”, “Youths’ Labour Rights Protection”, and “Others” were classified as the ten issues used to examine every candidate’s implementation of children and youth issues in their proposals.

     The organisations classified every proposal, according to the percentage of this issue being mentioned, into highly frequent, frequent, and less frequent ones. Highly frequently mentioned proposals could be grouped into “Nursing” (100%), “Subsidy” (87%), and “Gaming” (87%); frequently mentioned issue includes “Children’s Right to Be Heard and Public Participation”, and “Children’s Health” both issued were brought up by 73% of candidates; as for the less frequently discussed topics were “Parenting-Friendly Environment” (67%), “Parenting-Friendly Housing” (67%), and “Youths’ Labour Rights Protection” (60%), all of which were mentioned by less than seventy per cent of candidates; nonetheless, the percentage of the “Others” group being taken into the discussion was only at sixty per cent. Through analysis, it is disclosed that as many as 87% of candidates put forward political proposals on parenting financial support, although voters would perceive the offered cash subsidies, past experience showed that whenever the government increased relevant subsidies, there will be a chain effect where related industries service providers raising costs in disguised form. Hence, to what extent those parenting families would benefit from the policies remains uncertain.

Highly Frequently Discussed Political Proposals

Nursing and Edu-Care Services

Homerun for nursing policies, but insufficient attention to the quality of nursing services and security risks
As discovered within the analysis, each mayoral candidate (100%) proposed policies on “Nursing and Edu-Care Services”, those policies could be further subdivided into three groups:
  1. Increase Public Nursing Capacity

         All candidates proposed up-scaling nursing and Edu-Care services policies, and over ninety per cent (93%) stated to increase the quota of people accepted in public kindergarten.

  2. Optimise the Environment of Nursing-related Occupations

         Nearly seventy per cent (67%) of candidates raised political proposals of optimising the working environment of nursing service providers, the proposals include a raise in salary for Edu-Care personnel such as expertise bonuses, establishing additional bonuses for long-term workers and lowering the teacher-student ratio; encouraging kindergartens to improve the welfare of Edu-Care givers, and proposing insurance incentives of welfare funds, etc., to motivate these Edu-Care givers to stay for long-term.

  3. Provide Temporary Caring and Extended Caring Services
         There are over fifty per cent (53%) of candidates proposed establishing more temporary caring facilities or combining current parenting facilities with public nursing to provide fixed-location temporary caring services and increase the quota of people accepted in public nursing facilities. As for temporary caring issues, a few candidates called to subsidise Families in Adversity of the temporary caring costs from the government. Moreover, regarding the extended caring services, some candidates proposed using governmental funding to support the service; expanding the service to a broader public who needs the assistance, for instance, single parenting families, and extending business hours of the temporary care service (prolonging from eight o’clock till eleven o'clock) and etc.
     CWLF commended the fact that mayoral candidates of the six special municipalities are generally concerned about nursing and caring issues and include them in their political proposals, in the meantime, however, CWLF urges the candidates to also focus on the quality of nursing facilities and security risks lies in those facilities. Even though it’s discovered that sixty-seven per cent of candidates raised proposals on improving the working environments of childcare facilities, ever since the quasi-public policy was introduced, contracted private nursing facilities and childcare workers that joined quasi-public childcare and quasi-public kindergarten gradually increased, and the government chasing on higher KPI, there are cases of problems such as charging based on concocted pretexts, over-acceptance of children and etc. It is not seen that candidates proposed to examine the quality of childcare services, conduct more frequent inspections, or implement a fair mechanism for violators to withdraw.
     In recent years, several cases of childcare facilities mistreating children were disclosed, resulting in parents not feeling safe putting their children in care. CWLF Advocacy Centre Senior Associate Director Li Hon-Wen disclosed that according to the foundation’s “2017 Survey of Child Care Demand and Child Care Policy Intentions” the “Quality of caregivers” is the key factor in parents determining whether to take their children to childcare. Li also expressed his affirmation of seeing the candidates focusing on improving caregiving personnel’s terms of labour, however, not seeing candidates raising awareness about the prevention of abuse and mistreatment happening in childcare, kindergartens, and house nursing. He urges all candidates that attention should be paid to the improvement of the quality of childcare services providers and the safety check mechanism for children in childcare.

Parenting Financial Support

87% of candidates increase cash benefits, subsidising both prenatal and postnatal care

     Eighty-seven per cent of candidates raised parenting financial support-related proposals, which can be subdivided into three groups:

  1. Increase childcare subsidization
         Sixty per cent of candidates proposed to increase childcare subsidization for residents in that city with children 0 to 2 years old. The range of adjustment is from 1,200 NTD to 5,500 NTD, the average additional amount is 2,575 NTD. For residents with children 2 to 6 years old, candidates proposed to increase monthly subsidization for kindergarten childcare, the minimum amount of 833 NTD and maximum of 4,553 NTD, the average additional amount is 2,569 NTD.
  2. Increase fertility perks/bonuses
         Fifty-three per cent of candidates raised proposals on a one-time birth perk/subsidy, more subsidies for parents with more births. Taking the first child as an example, the minimum childbirth subsidy is 10,000 NTD, the maximum is 50,000 NTD, and the average additional amount is 20,000; for the second birth, the least amount of birth subsidy is 12,000 NTD and the minimum for the third birth is 20,000 NTD, maximum for both is 50,000 NTD.
  3. Provide prenatal and postnatal care subsidisation.
         What is also worth noticing is that besides the fertility perks, there is also forty-seven per cent of candidates raised concerns about prenatal and postnatal care subsidisation. Prenatal subsidisation, for example, subsidises or provides discounts on transportation for pregnant women to prenatal check-ups, to reduce the transportation expenses for these women. As for postnatal care, some candidates proposed supporting confinement subsidisation, to-door confinement services, home-based child-rearing instructors, etc. In recent years, city governments brought out a one-time maternity bonus/perk policy, nonetheless, the actual effect on raising the fertility rate remains limited. In this evaluation, it’s found that more candidates are prone to focus on pregnancy welfare, and it is worth encouraging that they proposed to provide more pre and postnatal subsidisations and relevant services.

Children’s Gaming, Entertainment, and Cultural Recreation

53% of candidates plan to establish more parent-child facilities and playgrounds, however, ignored youths’ leisure rights
      Along with “Parenting Financial Supports”, another issue favoured by eighty-seven per cent of candidates is “Children’s Gaming, Entertainment, and Cultural recreation”. However, the hardware facilities for children’s and youths’ leisure, and entertainment were less aware. More than half (53%) of candidates brought up widespread inclusive parks and amusement equipment, and nearly half (47%) of whom proposed continuously increasing the number of parent-child centres as well as expanding the functions of parent-child centres. CWLF Senior Associate Director Li Hon-Wen pointed out that the service of parent-child centres is subjected to children under the age of six, and their caregivers; inclusive parks and equipment set on playgrounds are available for people aged zero to twelve. On the contrary, only thirteen per cent of candidates proposed proposals regarding youths aged twelve to eighteen, such as issuing entertainment coupons and establishing youth-friendly venues, etc. All indicated that candidates generally disregard youths’ leisure rights.

     On the other hand, according to the CWLF “2020 Report of Taiwan Children’s Leisure and Free Gaming Situation Survey,” 54.3% of youths often spend time at parks, embarkments and other outdoor venues; 38% of them go to supermarkets, shopping malls, department stores and convenience stores or other indoor places. However, few of the places mentioned were designed exclusively for children and youths, thus might not be able to satisfy the requirements targeting on children’s gaming and leisure. Director Li at CWLF urged all candidates to establish more parent-child venues, children’s playgrounds, and other facilities. It is also crucial to consider the entertainment needs of children and youths of different age ranges to create more diverse and friendly public venues, making parks, restaurants, and more places for children and youths to enjoy leisure time.

Frequently Discussed Political Proposals

Children’s Right to Be Heard and Public Participation

73% of candidates mentioned children’s Right to Be Heard in their proposals, but the content remained hollow, Education to Children’s Rights also required enhancement
     On Children’s Right to Be Heard and Public Participation part, the proposals raised by the candidates were narrow, almost fifty per cent (47%) of them proposed expanding children’s public participation by providing youths with a platform to exchange their perspectives; providing municipal internship opportunities, etc., there are another forty per cent of candidates proposed to strengthen the publicity and implementation of “The Protection of Children and Youths Welfare and Rights Act” by encouraging schools or civil society to design activities to enhance civic awareness. However, it has been eight years since Taiwan passed the “Implementation Act of the Convention on the Rights of the Child” according to CWLF “2022 Survey of Children Expressive Behaviour” found that nearly fifty per cent of schoolers felt the government not providing sufficient opportunity for youngsters to participate when making child and youth-related policies. Senior Associate Director in CWLF Li Hon-Wen urges all candidates to arrange more channels to let youths voice up for policies relating to themselves.
     Good Neighbors Taiwan Secretary-General Yang Kuo-Jeng indicated that based on their study on “Taiwan Children’s Rights Index Report”, they found that only thirty per cent of children in the six municipalities know about the “Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)”, and a shocking number of 85% of children had not participated in any educational events related to the CRC in the past year. Yang urged candidates to promote educational programs related to the Rights of Children so the general people could be more aware of Children’s Rights.

Health of Child

33% of candidates focused on lunch at school, children’s medical care and healthiness ought to be more strengthened
     The children’s health-related proposals were mostly focused on school lunches, over thirty per cent (33%) were about keeping the quality of school lunches in check, providing free nutritious lunches and so on. Director Hsiu Huei-Yu at the John Tung Foundation urges future mayors to promote the nutritional quality of children’s school meals to help children recognise the original tastes of ingredients, cultivate children’s healthy diets and good lifestyles, and prevent children from obesity or chronic diseases so that they can establish a firm base to a healthy body. In addition, Wang Yuan-Ting-Director at CHAT expressed his concerns that in addition to dietary issues, the COVID-19 epidemic has exposed the fragility of the Taiwanese medical network for children being unable to respond to cases of acute and rare diseases of children. He urges every candidate to enhance the children’s medical network and basic medical or health care.

     On the side, there is nearly thirty per cent (27%) of candidates raised proposals about mental health issues such as establishing free fixed-point psychological counselling services and increasing the number of the school psychologist and social workers, these proposals are worthy of recognition, but other candidates’ political proposals on children’s mental health are relatively vague. CWLF Director Li stated that compared with the tripled suicide rate among adolescents in Taiwan within a decade, the “2022 Taiwan Children’s Mental Health and Counselling Resources Survey” by CWLF has pointed out that problems, for instance, insufficient campus mental health publicity, insufficient accessibility of counselling resources on campus, and limited online counselling resources, etc., Li urges the future mayors of the six special municipalities to strengthen prevention publicity and activities related to children’s mental health, and devote more resources to increase the accessibility of such services.

     Director Shen Chiung-Tao at NTUCFRC also imposed the close connections between parent-child relations and children’s mental health. It was found according to the centre’s long-term analysis of Taiwanese children that those who suffered from neglection, childhood trauma (e.g. domestic violence) or bullying, has a higher possibility to develop internet addiction, self-harming and hurtful behaviours. Shen urges the candidates to pay attention to the physical and mental health of children, improve parental knowledge through family education, help children practice emotional management through life skills training, and positive interpersonal interaction, etc., so can increase resilience and reduce physical and mental health risks, and implement the promises of the “Convention on the Rights of the Child” on the rights to health, protection, survival and development.

Less Frequently Discussed Political Proposals

Friendly Parenting Environment

Only 67% of candidates care about establishing a friendly parenting environment, and voices of parenting families were not attended.
     There are sixty-seven per cent of candidates raised concerns about establishing a friendly-parenting environment and related proposals; forty per cent of candidates proposed establishing more parent-child toilets in parks, installing more nursing rooms and other childcare facilities; more than thirty (33) per cent of the candidates mentioned establishing school lanes (forbidding the entrance of automobiles or scooters in narrow lanes at times children going and leaving school), improvement of sidewalks and other childcare traffic safety policies. From CWLF “2012 Report of Survey to Friendly Parenting Environment in Taiwan”, it is found that parents with young children were often caught in three major problems “hard to walk, hard to toilet, hard to travel”, another report of “2022 Focus Group on Gaps Between Expectation and Reality of Parenting” also disclosed that the current parenting environment has a predicament, for instance, the parent-child parking spaces being too small to get in and out of the car; there is no baby changing station in the men’s rooms, etc. Director of CWLF Li Hon-Wen then urges candidates to listen more to the voices of parents; widely establish parenting facilities based on the requirements of parenting families, and build the six special municipalities into model cities for friendly parenting, so that parents could raise children free of care.

Friendly-Parenting Housing

As house buying misery index keeps rising, there are only 67% of candidates raised friendly-parenting housing proposals

     Over thirty per cent (33%) of candidates raised proposals to establish more social residents with public nursing centres within. Nearly thirty per cent (27%) put forward proposals that parenting families with two or more children could get priority to be accepted by social houses. However, the slow-going construction of social residents made the urgent needs of families with children unable to fulfil. Corresponding to the latest housing price affordability index released by the Ministry of the Interior in October this year, the national housing loan burden rate in the second quarter this year was 39.62%, an increase of 1.27% from the previous quarter, meaning that nearly 40% of the household income of homebuyers must be spent on paying mortgages, which is a new historic high. Obviously, the misery index of homebuying had spiked once more. As housing is a major concern to many parents with children, sadly the candidates paid little attention to the housing needs of parenting families.

Friendly Parenting Workplaces and Youths’ Labour Rights Protection

Less than 70% of candidates concerned about friendly-parenting workplaces, Youths’ labour rights listed bottom on charts

     In this analysis, it is discovered that forty per cent of candidates proposed to encourage enterprises to set up nursery places or breastfeeding rooms through subsidies and rewards; another twenty-seven per cent of candidates proposed to encourage enterprises to implement flexible working hours, friendly maternity and parental leave. Director Shen at NTUCFRC suggested that local governments should fundamentally create a “Parenting-Friendly Workspace” to motivate couples to have children. Shen expressed her contend to see candidates propose to increase various subsidies and increase family support services, however, the work pressure of parents or primary caregivers is a more important issue to lay an eye on. It is prompted that employers increase options for flexible working hours and work styles. According to NTUCFRC’s empirical research, parents’ work style significantly impacts children’s lifestyles. Compared with other types of working hours, children whose caregivers conduct atypical professions are more likely to have irregular resting and diet habits, which will trigger a serious negative impact on children’s physical and mental development.

     Director Li also pointed out that the CWLF “2019 Taiwan Women’s Fertility Willingness and Parenting Current Situation Survey Report” showed that 75.4% of career women often felt unbalanced between work and child-rearing, and those women who felt this unbalance were less likely to have more children. Proving that parenting-unfriendly workspaces affect largely the willingness of people of child-bearing age to have children. Pitifully, only very few candidates focused on issues of building parenting-friendly working environments.

     Proposals cared the least being “Youths’ Labour Rights Protection” even though there are some candidates called to enhance the inspection of cooperative education and strengthen labour education, but only few did. Generally speaking, candidates in this election rarely raise proposals on eliminating obstacles to youth employment and preventing youth from being exploited by employers, or similar issues. It is expected that more mayoral candidates of the six special municipalities could pay more attention to the protection of children’s labour rights and interests and put forward more pragmatic measures to make improvements.

Children’s affairs focusing NOGs put forward three major demands, calling on the future mayors of the six special municipalities to fulfil their children and youths-related political proposals

     The mayoral election will be taking place on November 26th, five NGOs working on children and youths welfare including Child Welfare League Foundation (CWLF), Child Health Alliance Taiwan (CHAT), John Tung Foundation, Good Neighbors Taiwan, National Taiwan University Children and Family Research Center (NTUCFRC) Sponsored by CTBC (China Securities and Investment Corporation) Charity Foundation are collectively appealing to the future mayors to fulfil the three major demands after them taking office, which are “be pragmatic on children and youths-related proposals”, “diversify childcare policies”, and “put children and youths participation on priority”.

  1. Be pragmatic on children and youths-related proposals, not only giving financial support but also beefing up, and giving priority to filling the gap in children’s policies.

         Some of the six special municipalities’ mayoral candidates put forward political proposals regarding children’s welfare, however only declarative concepts or slogans, but not substantive connotations. On the whole, most proposals emphasise cash subsidies, as many as 87% of candidates promised to increase childcare-related subsidies in an attempt to attract more parents’ votes. Children and youth-oriented NGOs are concerned that keep increasing cash subsidies would only crowd out the budget for promoting other varieties of services for children. The NGOs call on future mayors to not only add icing on the cake but to help in one’s hour of need, the priority should be put on filling up the gaps in policies and the actual situation, which includes implementing the quality of childcare services and keeping the safety of childcare service providers in check; strengthening the inspection, counselling and withdrawing mechanism of Edu-Care service providers; enriching the resources for children’s physical and mental health promotion; expand recreational spaces for youngsters, and strengthen the protection of children’s labour rights and interests, etc.

  2. Diversified childcare policies to make the six special municipalities all-around parenting-friendly model cities.

         Taking a comprehensive look at the candidates' child-rearing political proposals, most remain focused on childcare and Edu-Care insurance services, and financial support for child-rearing. In spite of that, related supports for instance parenting-friendly environment, which parents are concerning as well, were less valued by candidates. Compared with others, the six special municipalities with more financial resources, the mayors ought to focalise on the needs of parenting families with children at different life stages, devote to generalise parenting-friendly facilities, improve child-friendly transportation environment, optimise parenting-friendly housing policies, create more child-rearing friendly workplaces, and other supporting mechanisms. In addition to providing parenting support for families with children under six years old, it is also suggested to expand the beneficiaries of childcare policies to families with school-age children over six and youngsters from twelve to eighteen years old, so as to build the six special municipalities models cities for all-round childcare friendly cities.

  3. Given priority to children’s participation, accommodate children’s opinions when making policies for children and youths, to establish child-friendly cities.
         Referring to the “Child-Friendly City” proposed by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), NGOs suggest that future mayors of the six municipalities should devote themselves to the maintenance and implementation of Children’s Right to Be Heard when it comes to municipal governance and to facilitate children’s civic participation. When making decisions on policies related to children’s rights and interests, there should be a permanent mechanism to consult children’s opinions; implement assessments of policies and regulations for the possible impacts on children’s rights and interests; enhance education and publicity on children’s rights, so that children, parents and all others would respect children’s human rights; moreover, the future mayors should also refer to the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and relevant regulations, strategies proposing ought to base on children’s perspectives and needs, raising specific strategies for creating a child-friendly environment, so the six special municipalities could be upgraded to child-friendly cities that protect children’s rights, so to be in line with international standards.
Back to list
Contact
TEL: 02-2799-0333
FAX: 02-8797-3131
ADD: 7F., No. 21, Ln. 583, Ruiguang Rd., Neihu Dist., Taipei City 114694, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Copyright © 2024 財團法人中華民國兒童福利聯盟基金會
Powered by A-Cart web design